SAN FRANCISCO — A Georgia couple and a company that own homes in Florida filed a class action in federal court in California on Dec. 2 against the maker of hurricane straps that were attached to their homes, alleging that the straps are defective because they prematurely corrode and do not protect homes against damages caused by hurricane-force winds (Cary W. Cooper, et al. v. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. Inc., et al., No. 19-cv-7901, N.D. Calif.).
TRENTON, N.J. — A federal judge in California on Dec. 5 granted motions for summary judgment by the manufacturer and retailers of Maytag washing machines in a putative class action alleging that the washers were not energy efficient despite their product labels, dismissing all claims, including ones under California’s unfair competition law, false advertising law and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Charlene Dzielak, et al. v. Whirlpool Corp., et al., No. 12-0089, D. N.J., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210429).
FRESNO, Calif. — A federal judge in California on Dec. 4 dismissed California unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims in a lawsuit alleging that a mortgage lender attempted to foreclose on a personal residence despite the plaintiff’s efforts to seek a loan modification, allowing the plaintiff leave to amend the fraudulent and unfair business practices prongs of his UCL claims (Darryl Banton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, et al., No. 19-00928, E.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210909).
SAN JOSE, Calif. — In a putative class complaint filed Nov. 27 in California federal court, a college student claims that the popular TikTok video-sharing app and its predecessor Musical.ly have “clandestinely . . . vacuumed up” users’ personally identifiable information (PII) and transferred it to China, alleging computer fraud, invasion of privacy and unfair competition, among other things (Misty Hong v. ByteDance Inc., et al., No. 5:19-cv-07792, N.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Nov. 20 trimmed the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), California unfair competition law (UCL) and state tort law claims against the operator of a diversion program for individuals accused of intentionally passing bad checks related to letters sent by the company offering the program as an alternative to prosecution and left in place only claims related to fees the company charged (Karen Solberg, et al. v. Victim Services, Inc., et al., No. 14-5266, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201622).
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Dec. 2 upheld the dismissal of a man’s lawsuit accusing Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and U.S. Bank N.A. of violating the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding that the causes of action were barred by claim preclusion because they could have been raised in an earlier lawsuit (Vahe Aftandilian v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al., No. 18-56666, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35768).
SANTA CLARA, Calif. — A California judge on Nov. 19 dismissed a conservative organization’s lawsuit asserting California unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims against YouTube LLC and its parent company Google Inc. in a lawsuit alleging that they unlawfully restricted the plaintiff’s content on YouTube (Prager University v. Google LLC, et al., No. 19-340667, Calif. Super., Santa Clara Co., 2019 Cal. Super. LEXIS 2034).
PASADENA, Calif. — Partially affirming, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 27 held that a lower federal court properly dismissed a claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) in a dispute arising from a frozen fruit mixture containing pomegranate arils that were contaminated with the hepatitis A virus, concluding that the lower court properly interpreted that the jury did not find the pomegranate arils supplier fully liable for the pomegranate adulteration (Townsend Farms, Inc. v. United Juice Corp., et al., Nos. 18-55067 and 18-55068, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35589).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Nov. 26 granted a medical technology company’s motion to strike and/or dismiss counterclaims under the Sherman Act and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) in its lawsuit alleging that a company used its confidential, proprietary and trade secret information to develop a line of spectral flow cytometers (Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Cytek Biosciences Inc., et al., No. 18-00933, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205465).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Nov. 20 granted a plaintiff’s motion for class certification in a lawsuit brought under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) alleging that a bank failed to pay interest on escrow accounts on mortgage loans, noting that it “is hard to imagine a case more worthy of class treatment” (William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, et al., No. 18-05131, N.D. Calif.. 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202448).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge in California on Nov. 15 denied GNC Holdings Inc.’s motion to dismiss California unfair competition law (UCL) and all other claims in a consumer class lawsuit alleging that the product labels describing GNC’s dietary supplements' functions were unlawful because they did not include a federally required disclaimer (Richa Arora, et al. v. GNC Holdings, Inc., No. 19-02414, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198723).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal magistrate judge in California on Nov. 8 partially denied an employer’s motion for partial summary judgment in a wage and hour violations lawsuit brought by a former employee, finding that the California unfair competition law (UCL) claim survives the motion because it seeks only restitution and not statutory or civil penalties (Stephen Carter v. Golden Gate Freightliner Inc., No. 19-02034, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194910).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Nov. 14 granted Google Inc.’s motion to dismiss California unfair competition law (UCL) and Sherman Act claims in a messenger application developer’s lawsuit alleging that it monopolized application distributionwith Google Play and Android to suppress competition (Paul Joseph Sayre v. Google, Inc., No. 19-02247, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198622).
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A federal judge in California on Nov. 12 denied a loan servicer’s motion to dismiss California unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims in a class action alleging that it conducted “fraudulent assessment and collection of unperformed, unfair, or unlawfully marked-up property valuation and inspection fees” (Mary A. Rhodeman, et al. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al., No. 18-2363, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197944).
OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge in California on Nov. 15 granted The Hershey Co.’s motion for summary judgment on California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims in a class suit alleging that Hershey falsely labels its Brookside Dark Chocolate products as flavored with natural ingredients when they contain artificial flavor (Howard Clark, et al. v. The Hershey Company, No. 18-6113, N.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198630).
SANTA ANA, Calif. — An insurer’s lawsuit accusing a number of substance abuse treatment centers of common-law fraud, violation of California’ unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims can proceed in state court, a federal judge in California ruled Nov. 13, holding that the plaintiff company’s claims are not preempted by the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (Health Net Life Insurance Co. v. Morningside Recovery LLC, et al., No. 19-cv-1342, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197937).
SAN DIEGO — Consumers who filed a class complaint accusing Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. of misleading buyers with its juice labels filed a motion on Nov. 8 in a California federal court seeking preliminary approval of an agreement that will provide a $5.4 million settlement fund and will halt sales in the United States of drinks labeled with “no artificial flavors” that contain artificial versions of malic acid and/or fumaric acid (Crystal Hilsley, et al. v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., No. 17-2335, S.D. Calif.).
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — The makers of Harley-Davidson motorcycles failed to show that a class complaint bringing various state claims, including violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), involves damages in excess of $5 million, a federal judge in California ruled Nov. 7, granting a motion to remand (Matthew D. Greene, et al. v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., et al., No. 19-1647, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194896).
SAN FRANCISCO — A California appeals panel on Nov. 8 held that a lower court’s order that struck class allegations in a plaintiff’s lawsuit alleging unlawful business practices against her former employer is not appealable under the death knell doctrine, dismissing the appeal (Emielou Williams v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., No. A155479, Calif. App., 1st Dist., Div. 1, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS 1119).
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California on Nov. 4 granted in part Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s motion for summary judgment in a couple’s lawsuit accusing it of violating the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), finding that communications the lender had with the plaintiffs in 2013 about a loan modification application did not violate the statute because the borrowers were still in default on their mortgage loan (Walter H. Hackett III, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., No. 17-CV-07354, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193296).