Mealey's California Section 17200

  • April 16, 2024

    AG Sides With Insured In UCL Time Limit Case Before California High Court

    SAN FRANCISCO — California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an amicus curiae brief with the state’s Supreme Court supporting an insured in her challenge to the dismissal as time-barred of her lawsuit claiming that her insurer failed to properly investigate a claim, writing that the court should have applied the four-year statute of limitations based on her claim for injunctive relief under California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • April 16, 2024

    Rehab Plan Approved Over Workers’ Comp Insurer’s Objections In California Court

    REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Rejecting numerous objections from California Insurance Co. (CIC), a California state judge approved a rehabilitation plan that she said the state insurance commissioner described as being “designed to . . . complete CIC's exit from the state on terms that protect the Company, policyholders, and the public.”

  • April 15, 2024

    Movie Studio, Ana De Armas Fans Settle Dispute Over ‘Deceptive’ Trailer

    LOS ANGELES — A Hollywood studio and two fans of actress Ana De Armas on April 12 filed notice in California federal court that they have settled the fan’s claims accusing the studio of deceptively enticing them into paying to view a film by using footage in the trailer featuring De Armas that was cut from the final film.

  • April 15, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Allows Suit Against Nestlé For Deceptive Sales Of ‘White Morsels’

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — On remand from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a California federal judge on April 12 granted Nestlé USA Inc.’s motion to dismiss injunctive relief sought against it by consumers who claim that they were deceived into believing that the company’s “White Morsels” baking chips product was made of white chocolate but denied the motion as to their other claims, including for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • April 15, 2024

    Panel Affirms ‘Shark Tank’ Star Not Liable For Fraud By Companies He Promoted

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel upheld a ruling dismissing claims against one of the stars of “Shark Tank,” including for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding as the trial court ruled that he is not liable for alleged fraudulent practices by two companies that used his image and statements in their marketing campaign.

  • April 12, 2024

    23andMe Data Breach Suits Centralized In Northern California MDL

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) on April 11 granted a request by genetic testing company 23andMe to consolidate 39 pending lawsuits against it in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, all of which relate to a data breach in which ancestral records for roughly 6.9 million customers were hacked and allegedly sold online.

  • April 12, 2024

    Judge Says NJOY Can’t Email UCL Suit To Chinese Vape Makers

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge denied as “premature” a motion by e-cigarette maker NJOY LLC, an Altria Group Inc. subsidiary, to permit alternative service to several Chinese e-cigarette manufacturers it accuses of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and federal cigarette regulations by illegally selling “Elf Bar” and other brands of flavored disposable vapes (FDVs).

  • April 11, 2024

    Insurer Accused Of Using AI Software To Deny Claims ‘En Masse’ In Class Suit

    OAKLAND, Calif. — An insured filed a putative class action in California state court accusing his insurer of violating California’s insurance regulations and its unfair competition law (UCL) by using artificial intelligence (AI) software to deny claims for coverage.

  • April 10, 2024

    Viability Of UCL Class Action Involving Asbestos And Talc Rests With 9th Circuit

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments over whether allegations of a decades-long advertising campaign about the safety and purity of talcum powder sufficiently specifies the advertising in question and saves a California unfair competition law (UCL) class action alleging that in reality the products contained asbestos and other contaminants.

  • April 10, 2024

    Pharma Companies Seek High Court Review Of Ruling Reversing FCA Suit Dismissal

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Pharmaceutical companies accused of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ reversal of a district court’s dismissal of a qui tam suit against them, arguing, in part, that the panel “created a circuit split by holding that a relator can avoid the public disclosure bar by ‘stitching together’ public disclosures.”

  • April 10, 2024

    Products’ Nutrition Claims With ‘Childlike Drawings’ Are Puffery, Judge Says

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a fruit company’s motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for labeling various fruit products as “Healthy” and providing “Good Nutrition” despite containing significant amounts of sugar, writing that the statements are next to “childlike drawings” and therefore unlikely to deceive a consumer.

  • April 09, 2024

    Judge: Deception Claims Over ‘100% Recyclable’ Plastic Bottles May Proceed

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on April 8 denied a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought by three consumers and The Sierra Club accusing The Coca-Cola Co. and two other bottling companies of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by labeling plastic bottles as “100% recyclable,” finding that the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged based on a survey that most consumers would be deceived.

  • April 08, 2024

    Driver Appeals Grant Of Summary Judgment On UCL Claim For ‘Unfair’ COVID Premiums

    SAN FRANCISCO — A driver on April 5 appealed to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a California federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of GEICO after finding that it did not violate California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by unfairly profiting from a premium giveback program initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • April 04, 2024

    Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Suit Demanding $160,000 From Medi-Cal Insurer For Supplies

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on April 3 affirmed the dismissal of a medical supplies provider’s lawsuit against an insurer that operates under the state’s Medicaid program, finding that the provider failed to plead the existence of a contract that was breached, fraud or a violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) based on the provider’s alleged nonpayment of more than $160,000 for medical supplies.

  • April 03, 2024

    Google, Privacy Plaintiffs Propose Injunctive Relief To Settle Data-Tracking Suit

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — Leapfrogging over the typical procedure of seeking preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement over Google LLC’s purported tracking of users’ internet browsing activity and data, the named plaintiffs filed a motion in California federal court seeking final approval of a “groundbreaking” agreement under which the technology giant pledges to make changes to its data collection and retention practices, among other things.

  • April 03, 2024

    Chili’s Customers: Class Damages Methodology Review Not Needed In Data Breach Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court does not need to review a question presented by a restaurant chain owner in a data breach case concerning the damages methodology used by the certified classes’ expert as the underlying decision doesn’t present the question Brinker International Inc. seeks to resolve, restaurant customers argue in their respondent brief.

  • April 02, 2024

    Judge Grants Summary Judgment In Favor Of Baby Food Maker In Heavy Metals Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted a baby food maker’s motion for summary judgment on class action claims against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its “organic” baby food products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and consumer protection laws of several other states.

  • April 02, 2024

    HP’s $18M Age Bias Class, Collective Settlement Granted Final Approval

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted final approval of an $18 million settlement to be paid by HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. (together, HP) to end a collective and class complaint accusing the technology company of terminating older workers during workforce reductions and replacing them with younger employees in violation of federal and California law, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • April 02, 2024

    Microsoft, ChatGPT Say Class Suit’s UCL, Privacy Claims Over ChatGPT Training Fail

    SAN FRANCISCO — Imposing liability on companies that used information posted to the internet by “hundreds of millions of Americans” to train artificial intelligence would be unprecedented, and the plaintiffs in a putative class action have not shown that the alleged conduct violated underlying laws required for California unfair competition law (UCL) claims or that that they incurred an injury as required to proceed with those and other claims, Microsoft and OpenAI entities argue in reply briefs filed in California federal court in support of dismissal.

  • April 01, 2024

    Judge Won’t Reconsider Order Allowing Heavy Metal Claims Against Chocolate Company

    SAN DIEGO — The chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on March 29 denied a chocolate company’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying in part its motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for allegedly concealing the presence of heavy metals in its chocolates, rejecting the company’s argument that the court’s ruling permitting labeling claims was based on a “misunderstanding.”

  • March 29, 2024

    Flyer’s Suit Against Delta For Deceptive ‘Greenwashing’ Not Preempted, Judge Rules

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on March 28 granted in part and denied in part Delta Air Lines Inc.’s motion to dismiss a flyer’s putative class action accusing the airline of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by misleading consumers with “greenwashing” statements such as describing itself as “carbon-neutral” based on its environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments.

  • March 28, 2024

    Judge Nixes Some Lead Claims Related To Trader Joe’s Dark Chocolate Products

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California on March 27 dismissed without prejudice California state law claims, including an unfair competition law (UCL) claim, against Trader Joe’s Co. related to allegations that its dark chocolate products contain lead and other heavy metals but denied dismissal with regard to claims brought pursuant to business practice laws in other states.

  • March 27, 2024

    Judge Allows UCL, Negligence Claims Against Roblox In Mothers’ ‘Gambling’ Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on March 26 granted in part and denied in part a motion by Roblox Corp. to dismiss a putative class action brought against it by two mothers who accuse it of being liable for their minor children’s engagement in illegal gambling games on the Roblox platform.

  • March 27, 2024

    Judge Remands UCL Suit Against Gift Card Issuer Over Drained Cards

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on March 26 remanded a complaint filed by the San Francisco city attorney on behalf of California against a gift card issuer and three banking entities that the city attorney accuses of violating the state’s unfair competition law (UCL) by issuing insufficiently secured pre-loaded debit cards that were allegedly drained before being used by customers who paid for the cards.

  • March 27, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Construction Defects Insurance Suit After Parties Agree To Settle

    OAKLAND, Calif. — After the parties notified the court that they had reached a global settlement, a federal judge in California on March 26 dismissed with prejudice the case between two excess insurers and a construction firm and related entities that sought a defense for a series of construction defect claims.