(June 12, 2020, 12:34 PM EDT) -- SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California appeals panel on June 11 held that an attorney’s pleadings failed to allege a basis to establish that a fiduciary relationship exists between attorneys representing opposing parties in trust proceedings, nor do they “suggest any other legal footing for” his breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, contempt, breach of a settlement agreement and an alleged oral stipulation and unfair business practices causes of action (Jeffrey L. Licht v. John M. Gantus, No. G057394, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 3, 2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3631)....