Mealey's (March 25, 2021, 1:48 PM EDT) -- GREENSBORO, S.C. — A man’s testimony that he heard that a defendant performed worked for his employer is not sufficient evidence from which one could conclude that the man was exposed to asbestos, especially since other evidence strongly suggests that it was a third entity that actually performed the insulation work, a federal judge in North Carolina said March 22 in granting a company summary judgment....