(March 5, 2019, 10:07 AM EST) -- PHILADELPHIA — Questions regarding the applicability of the bare-metal defense and a man’s exposure overcome summary judgment, and the Pennsylvania federal judge presiding over the case said Feb. 14 that he would not address a successor-in-interest argument the defendant appears to have sat on in an attempt to spring a surprise on the plaintiffs (Obediah Walker III, et al. v. Viad Corp., No. MDL 875, 16-215, E.D. Pa., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24614)....