Mealey's (December 21, 2021, 9:31 AM EST) -- PORTLAND, Ore. — Plaintiffs need not have identified specific worksites where asbestos exposure occurred, testimony linking a carpenter to a defendant’s joint compound at dozens of locations suffices and a trial judge did not err in allowing amendment or entering judgment on a “puzzling or confusing” loss of consortium claim, an Oregon appeals court said in affirming an $8.7 million verdict on Dec. 8....