Mealey's (June 24, 2015, 1:43 PM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — A panel ruling concluding that costs spent complying with subsequently delayed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) employer mandate did not constitute an injury conflicts with Supreme Court precedent, a health care provider told the Supreme Court on May 14 (Kawa Orthodontics LLP v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al., No. 14-10296, 11th 14-1367, U.S. Sup.).

(Petition available. Document #93-150624-010B.)

Kawa Orthodontics LLP sued U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and U.S. Internal Revenue Service Acting Commissioner Daniel Werfel under the...