(June 27, 2016, 11:05 AM EDT) -- LEXINGTON, Ky. — An expert’s proposed opinions concerning the labeling and intended use of a defendant’s products, the compounds found in bloodroot and the dangers of escharotic agents are relevant and not unduly prejudicial, a Kentucky federal judge ruled June 22, allowing the expert to provide testimony on behalf of the U.S. government’s lawsuit for violations under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S. Code Section 301 (United States of America v. Samuel A. Girod, No. 15-CR-87, E.D. Ky.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81047)....