(May 4, 2016, 8:23 AM EDT) -- TRENTON, N.J. — Maibec Inc. says in an April 27 motion filed in New Jersey federal court that the opinions of an expert for plaintiffs who claim that white-cedar roofing shingles made by the company are defective should be excluded because he has no experience in the wood-manufacturing field and that his opinions are unreliable (Ilene Stern, et al. v. Maibec Inc., No. 11-3951, D. N.J.).
(Motion available. Document #09-160506-013M.)
The manufacturer asserts that the proffered testimony of Dean Rutila, P.E., fails to satisfy the requirements...
Maibec Says Plaintiffs’ Expert Lacks Experience, Has Unreliable Opinions
To view the full article, register now.
Try for FREE for fourteen days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login