Judge Seeks Briefing On Conflict Between States’ Consumer Protection Laws

(April 18, 2016, 1:25 PM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A judge on April 15 asked for additional briefing on how to handle differences between California consumer protection laws and those of other states in a UCL, Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et seq., suit over an alleged misrepresentations about a joint supplement (Vincent D. Mullins, et al. v. Premier Nutrition Corp., No. 13-1271, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51139, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51140).

(Class ruling available. Document #58-160419-039Z. Summary judgment ruling available. Document #58-160419-040Z.)

Kathie Sonner sued Premier Nutrition...
To view the full article, register now.