(March 31, 2016, 11:03 AM EDT) -- PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 28 upheld a district court’s order denying a motion to disqualify counsel from representing a plaintiffs’ class in a consumer suit brought under the Fair Credit Report Act (FCRA), marking the second time the appellate panel has ruled on questions regarding conflicts of interest and the adequacy of counsel in the case (Robert Radcliffe, et al v. Jose Hernandez, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc., et al., No. 14-56101, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5691)....