(May 20, 2021, 1:15 PM EDT) -- LOS ANGELES — A California appeals court panel on May 17 sustained a trial court’s ruling finding that the president of a roofing company accused of applying the wrong roof coating was the company’s alter ego and, therefore, should be named as an additional debtor in judgment, finding that sufficient evidence showed that the president made the decision to use the cheaper product and that he regularly used company funds for personal use....