U.S. Supreme Court Holds Oral Arguments In Consolidated Patent Cases

Mealey's (February 23, 2016, 3:31 PM EST) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — The “objective/subjective” test for enhanced patent damages — already rejected in the attorney fee context — came under fire Feb. 23 at the U.S. Supreme Court in one hour of consolidated argument covering two cases (Stryker Corp., et al. v. Zimmer Inc. and Zimmer Surgical, No. 14-1520; Halo Electronics Inc. v. Pulse Electronics Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp., No. 14-1513, U.S. Sup.).

(Transcript available. Document #16-160307-006T.)

Attorney Jeffrey B. Wall, representing petitioner Halo Electronics Inc. in its dispute with Pulse Electronics Inc. and...
To view the full article, register now.