(July 30, 2020, 1:41 PM EDT) -- PHOENIX — While significant evidentiary deficiencies call into question the naming of a nondiverse asbestos defendant, that evidence does not eliminate all chances of recovery or the possibility of art- and jewelry-related exposures outside a federal enclave, a federal judge in Arizona said July 26 in remanding the case (Renee Hatten v. Grobet USA, et al., No. 20-99, D. Ariz., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132342)....