Questions Of Fact Exist On Whether Reasonable Care Was Taken To Heat Property

Mealey's (May 27, 2020, 9:11 AM EDT) -- BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — An insurer is not entitled to summary judgment on the applicability of its policy’s exclusion for water damage caused by frozen pipes because questions of fact exist on whether the insured took reasonable care to maintain heat in the second home, a Connecticut federal judge said May 21 (Steven Van Natta, et al. v. Great Lakes Reinsurance [UK] SE, No. 18-438, D. Conn., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89477)....