(January 11, 2016, 12:14 PM EST) -- RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A man who pleaded guilty to one count of arson and one count of insurance fraud should not be required to pay $1,322.23 to the city of Rancho Cucamonga because the local fire department was not a victim to his crimes, a California appeals panel ruled Jan. 7 (People v. Michael Miccio, No. E062804, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 2; 2016 Calif. App. Unpub. LEXIS 144).
(Opinion available. Document #20-160122-009Z.)
A panel of Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, Justices Art W....
California Appeals Court Vacates Order Requiring Arson Defendant To Pay Restitution
To view the full article, register now.
Try for FREE for fourteen days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login