Mealey's (May 12, 2020, 3:56 PM EDT) -- DENVER — Five judges of the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 10 dissented about the denial of an en banc rehearing because only two surviving members of an original panel voted against rehearing the case that the circuit chief judge calls “a panel decision that could single handedly dry up thousands of acres of irrigated Wyoming farmland” (C. Mark Cupps, et al. v. Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District, No. 18-8024, 10th Cir., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 11736)....