J&J Faults Admission Of Experts, Opinions For $9M Asbestos-Talc Verdict

Mealey's (May 1, 2020, 1:14 PM EDT) -- MIAMI — A judge improperly excluded evidence of testing on consumer talc and then compounded the error by admitting plaintiffs’ experts and “highly speculative” opinions, marring an Florida asbestos-talc case and leading to a $9 million verdict built at least partially on unsupported damages, Johnson & Johnson entities tells a judge in March 13 briefs (Blanca Moure-Cabrera v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 19-000727-CA, Fla. Cir., Miami-Dade Co.)....