Mealey's (February 28, 2020, 1:10 PM EST) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court should deny University of Pennsylvania’s petition in a suit alleging that the university acted imprudently while administering a 403(b) defined contribution individual account employee pension benefit plan because the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling in the case doesn’t conflict with Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), a plan participant argues in her Feb. 26 opposition brief (University of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Jennifer Sweda, et al., No. 19-784, U.S. Sup.)....