(December 4, 2015, 8:07 AM EST) -- CHICAGO — Entering judgment in a disability insurer’s favor was a manifest error because a question of fact exists regarding whether a disability claimant lost income as a result of his inability to carry a harness-based computer, an Illinois federal judge said Dec, 1 in vacating a judgment entered in the insurer’s favor (Stephen Dorf v. Standard Insurance Co., as successor to Minnesota Life Insurance Co., No. 13-6479, N.D. Ill.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161054).

(Opinion available. Document #17-151207-012Z.)

Stephen Dorf worked as a trader in...