Insurer’s Evidence Is ‘Inconsistent,’ ‘Contradictory,’ Insured Tells Texas Court

Mealey's (August 20, 2019, 11:23 AM EDT) -- HOUSTON — An insured recently asked a Texas appeals court to reverse a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of general liability and excess insurer, arguing that the insurer’s evidence for its open book account, unjust enrichment and breach of contract claims is “inconsistent with the facts” and “contradictory” (Loadmaster Universal Rigs, Inc.v. Twin City Fire Insurance, No. 01-19-00229-CV, Texas App., 1st Dist.)....