Respondent: ERISA Dispute Not Ripe For High Court Review

Mealey's (May 1, 2019, 1:43 PM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an April 29 opposition brief, a respondent told the U.S. Supreme Court it should deny a petition for certiorari that poses the question of whether the “actual knowledge” exception to the “generally applicable” six-year statute of limitations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act requires both knowledge that imprudent investment occurred and knowledge, at the time, that the investment was imprudent (Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al., v. Christopher Sulyma, et al., No. 18-1116, U.S. Sup.)....