(October 30, 2015, 9:37 AM EDT) -- DENVER — A district court did not err in determining that a health insurer’s denial of benefits for residential treatment of an insured’s eating disorder was reasonable because all of the...
Residential Treatment Was Not Medically Necessary, 10th Circuit Panel Affirms
To view the full article, register now.
Try for FREE for fourteen days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login