We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Panel Asked To Decide Whether SOX Whistleblower Evidence Was Properly Barred

(June 13, 2018, 9:06 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A plaintiff in a Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower lawsuit waived his challenge to a federal district court’s ruling excluding certain evidence supporting his claim that he was improperly terminated under SOX’s anti-retaliation provisions because he failed to properly address the court’s legal reasoning for excluding the evidence in his opening brief on appeal, defendants argue in a June 4 appellee brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Gordon Scott Stroh v. Saturna Capital Corp., et al., No. 17-35607, 9th Cir.)....
To view the full article, register now.