(September 23, 2015, 11:48 AM EDT) -- ATLANTA — A Florida man told the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a brief filed June 18 that a federal judge’s ruling awarding summary judgment to State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. should be overturned because a policy he had from the insurer was ambiguous as to when he took possession of a car that was previously owned by his ex-wife and involved in a fatal automobile accident (T. Patton Youngblood Jr. v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, No. 15-11214-D, 11th Cir.)....