(September 21, 2015, 8:44 AM EDT) -- RICHMOND, Va. — A property owner who entered into lease and site development agreements with a home improvement retailer argues in its July 8 brief filed in the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the trial court erred when it found that it was the owner of the building pad constructed on the site (St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, et al. v. THF Clarksburg Development Two, LLC, et al., No. 15-1453, 4th Cir.).

In addition, the property owner argues that the district court erred in...