(February 12, 2018, 9:26 AM EST) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — A drugmaker’s claim that the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ reversal of a trial court’s exclusion of expert causation testimony creates a circuit split should be seen for what it is — “little more than a fact-bound appeal of a decision with which it disagrees” — parents in a wrongful death suit against the company told the U.S. Supreme Court in their Feb. 2 respondents’ brief (Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Stephen Wendell, et ux., No. 17-747, U.S. Sup., 2018 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 477)....