Mealey's (January 11, 2018, 12:47 PM EST) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — An inter partes review (IPR) petitioner that successfully established obviousness of 32 claims of three patents nonetheless argues in a Jan. 9 brief that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling did not go far enough and should have instead invalidated all challenged claims (Vivint Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc., Nos. 2017-2218, -2219, -2220, -2260, -2261, -2262, Fed. Cir.)....