We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Judge Finds Question Exists On Whether Cameras Could Have Stopped Assault

(August 31, 2015, 1:52 PM EDT) -- COLUMBIA, S.C. — A South Carolina federal judge on Aug. 26 refused to set aside an order denying motions for summary judgment filed by a security company and the owners of a mall, finding that issues of fact exist as to whether they had a duty to install security cameras and whether the cameras would have prevented an assault that the property (Laura B. Moise, et al. v. AlliedBarton Security Services LLC, No. 3:12-cv-02022, D. S.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112983).

(Opinion available. Document #77-150909-003Z.)...
To view the full article, register now.