Mealey's (September 13, 2017, 9:09 AM EDT) -- ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 8 found that a lower federal court did not err in striking two paragraphs of a plainitff’s declaration filed in opposition to his former employer’s motion for summary judgment in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act interference lawsuit, further affirming the lower court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the judgment based on newly discovered evidence (Robert Liebman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, No. 16-17440, 11th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17426)....