Washington Panel Affirms No Coverage Ruling In Intentional Act Dispute

(August 16, 2017, 11:46 AM EDT) -- SEATTLE — A Washington appeals panel on Aug. 14 found that because an insured intentionally struck another person in the face several times and the harm of a broken jaw was reasonably foreseeable, there are no issues of material fact regarding whether the insured’s act was intentional (State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Nikolas Peters, No. 75705-9-I, Wash. App., Div. 1, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 1935)....

Attached Documents

Related Sections