Plaintiff Who Lost $8M Asbestos Verdict Wants Causation Cases Consolidated
Mealey's (May 9, 2017, 1:03 PM EDT) -- FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A motion by an asbestos plaintiff seeking to consolidate her appeal of a ruling excluding expert causation testimony involving cigarette filters with a second case challenging application of the Daubert standard is inappropriate because the court previously stayed her case and because the Florida Supreme Court has not accepted either case for review, Crane Co. told the court on March 14 (Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co., et al., No. SC16-2182, Fla. Sup.).