Federal Judge Rejects Replacement Expert’s ‘Every Exposure’ Testimony
Mealey's (August 13, 2015, 12:52 PM EDT) -- NEW ORLEANS — Plaintiffs fail to distinguish how an expert’s testimony that every exposure above background can cause disease differs from the type of “every exposure” testimony receiving a “largely negative”...
To view the full article, register now.
Try for FREE for fourteen days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login