(January 10, 2017, 12:26 PM EST) -- TACOMA, Wash. — A Washington judge did not err in finding that an insured is entitled to coverage for groundwater contamination at two of its sites because the evidence clearly supports the trial judge’s rulings; however, the judge did err in awarding attorney fees to the insured under the primary policy at issue, the Division II Washington Court of Appeals said Dec. 21 (The Port of Longview v. Arrowood Indemnity Co., et al., No. No. 46654-6-II, Wash. App., Div. 2; 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 3100)....