Mealey's (July 31, 2015, 2:05 PM EDT) -- DETROIT — A Michigan federal judge on July 29 found that an issue of fact exists as to whether a certain term used in an invoice by a law firm was materially deceiving and violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), denying the firm's motion for summary judgment on that claim (Earl D. Wilson v. Trott Law, P.C., No. 15-10747, E.D. Mich.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99439).

(Opinion available. Document #85-150818-019Z).

Charges

Earl Wilson missed mortgage payments, and the holder of the note hired Trott...