Judge Denies Insurer’s Motion To Stay, Permission To Appeal Rescission Dispute

(October 14, 2016, 11:09 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Oct. 11 rejected a products liability insurer's argument that interlocutory review of a May 27 order on the issue of rescission is warranted under 28 U.S. Code Section 1292(b) because the order involves a controlling question of law for which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion (Illinois Union Insurance Co., et al. v. Intuitive Surgical Inc., No. 13-04863, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140762).

(Order available.  Document #13-161020-006R.)

Products Liability

On Oct. 21, 2013, Illinois...
To view the full article, register now.