(September 9, 2016, 10:00 AM EDT) -- CINCINNATI — A district court did not err in finding that a disability claimant’s long-term benefits were properly terminated because the claimant failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that she is totally disabled as defined by the plan, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Aug. 23 (Christina Saunders v. Procter & Gamble Health & Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan, No. 16-3043, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15743)....