(August 17, 2016, 9:43 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — In a patent infringement lawsuit concerning computer security technology, a damages expert’s apportionment methodology is unreliable as it improperly inflates the apportionment base, a California federal judge ruled Aug. 15, partially excluding the testimony (Finjan Inc. v. Sophos Inc., No. 14-01197, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107831).

(Order available. Document #30-160909-006R.)

Finjan Inc. sued Sophos Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of patents involving technologies for computer and network security. Finjan accused Sophos of...