Mealey's Intellectual Property

  • February 13, 2024

    Dexcom Seeks To Add New Challenge To Abbott Glucose Monitoring Patent

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — In a new petition filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dexcom Inc. says that two new claims of the same patent already the subject of inter partes review (IPR) should also be examined after patent owner Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. recently added allegations of their infringement in federal court.

  • February 12, 2024

    New York Federal Judge Denies Reconsideration Request In Copyright Row

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York has again found that musical artists Shawn Carter, professionally known as Jay-Z, Timothy Mosley, professionally known as Timbaland, and Elgin Baylor Lumpkin, professionally known as Ginuwine, are entitled to summary judgment on allegations of copyright infringement.

  • February 12, 2024

    Frazetta Daughters Lack Standing In Copyright Row, Florida Federal Judge Says

    TAMPA, Fla. — Although allegations of direct copyright infringement leveled in connection with a “Frazetta Book Cover Art” book were proven, two of late artist Frank Frazetta’s daughters cannot remain in the case as plaintiffs, a federal judge in Florida indicated in a Feb. 9 summary judgment ruling.

  • February 12, 2024

    Studio To 2nd Circuit: Discovery Rule Applies In Posted Photo Infringement Suit

    NEW YORK — In an appellant reply brief, a photography studio tells the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that it sued over the online posting of its copyrighted pictures within three years of learning of the purported infringing use, making its complaint timely under the “discovery rule.”

  • February 12, 2024

    Injunction Is Part Of Agreement To Resolve Lloyd’s Trademark Infringement Case

    HOUSTON — Lloyd’s America Inc. and Corporation of Lloyd’s and the individual they sued in Texas federal court over alleged defamation and trademark infringement have reported reaching an agreement to resolve the suit, with terms including entry of a permanent injunction.

  • February 09, 2024

    Panel Issues Mixed Ruling In Appeal Of Post-Grant Review Of Vape Patent

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 9 said that although an obviousness challenge by Philip Morris Products S.A. to patented vaping technology was correctly decided in favor of the tobacco giant, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board wrongly found inadequate written descriptive support for two other claims.

  • February 09, 2024

    Photography Company Loses Bid For Home Venue In Copyright Case

    SEATTLE — Allegations that a rental homeowner ended negotiations to purchase copyrighted images of his Idaho rental properties but then displayed the images online have been dismissed by a federal judge in Washington.

  • February 09, 2024

    Manuals Wrongly Excluded From Prior Art Analysis, Federal Circuit Rules

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Inter partes review (IPR) of two patents relating to a meat and cheese slicer was reinstated Feb. 8 by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which said the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board not only wrongly found that manuals relied on by the petitioner were not publicly available but also erred in concluding that the remaining prior art failed to disclose two limitations.

  • February 08, 2024

    Petitioner: Integration Of Haptics In Augmented Reality Not New, Novel

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — The Patent Trial and Appeal Board was urged Feb. 7 to cancel various claims of a patent directed to augmented reality (AR) applications that feature integrated haptics, or touch feedback, in a petition for inter partes review (IPR) by a gaming company.

  • February 08, 2024

    Judge Grants Consolidation In Journalists’ AI Suit Against Microsoft, OpenAI

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York granted a motion to consolidate two journalists’ copyright infringement suit against OpenAI Inc. and related entities with previously consolidated cases involving fiction and nonfiction authors.

  • February 08, 2024

    Federal Circuit Tells Patent Board To Construe Claims As Proposed By Google

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 7 said an implicit claim construction by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of a disputed term in a climate control patent was unduly narrow.

  • February 07, 2024

    Online News Site Suffers Blow; Panel Says Use Of Copyrighted Photo Not Fair

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Independent Journal Review (IJR) must face allegations that it infringed a copyrighted photograph of musician Ted Nugent without a defense of copyright invalidity in place, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 6.

  • February 07, 2024

    Tesla Challenges Patented Vehicle Power Consumption Technology In New Petition 

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A patent that purportedly optimizes vehicle power consumption to yield improved fuel efficiency would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) by November 2005, the patent’s claimed priority date, Tesla Inc. tells the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

  • February 06, 2024

    Board Wrongly Shifted Burden During Inter Partes Review, Patent Owner Says

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The owner of a patented treatment of pre-myopia, myopia or progression of myopia says in a new appeal the Patent Trial and Appeal Board wrongly declared the technology obvious.

  • February 06, 2024

    Motorized Dumbbell Is Patent-Eligible, Appellant Tells Federal Circuit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Allowing a Utah federal judge’s determination of ineligibility under Section 101 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 101, to stand “would be fundamentally unfair” and cause the patent owner, a self-described “innovator in weightlifting technologies” and “pioneer of selectorized dumbbells,” to lose valuable ground to market “latecomer” iFIT Inc., the patent owner tells the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a Feb. 5 appellant brief.

  • February 06, 2024

    Panel Upholds Sanction But Reinstates Loofah Patent Infringement Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal magistrate judge in Arkansas did not abuse his discretion in sanctioning a patent owner for discovery abuse but committed several errors during claim construction, leading to a jury verdict and final judgment of noninfringement that must be vacated, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals found Feb. 5.

  • February 06, 2024

    Panel Affirms: Intake Form Insufficiently Creative For Copyright Protection

    ST. LOUIS — A win for infringement defendant Berkshire Hathaway Automotive Inc. (BHA)  has been confirmed by the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on grounds that the multinational conglomerate’s accused customer intake form is not copyrightable.

  • February 06, 2024

    Parties Debate Injunction Record, Await Ruling In OpenAI Trademark Dispute

    SAN FRANCISCO — OpenAI Inc. submitted what it portrays as an administrative motion to supplement the record but really is a local-rule-breaking attempt at filing a surreply in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction and fails to show the type of confusion the relief it seeks would warrant, defendants in a suit over a trademark and domain name argue in an opposition brief filed in California federal court.

  • February 06, 2024

    Patent Dispute Over Nasal Antiseptic Product Mooted, Michigan Federal Judge Finds

    DETROIT — Citing an infringement defendant’s decision to pull from the market an accused nasal antiseptic and promise to refrain from manufacturing or selling the product in the near future, a federal judge in Michigan has dismissed the case as moot over the objection of the patent owner.

  • February 05, 2024

    Panel Upholds Denial Of New Trial, Does Not Reach Patent Ineligibility Claim

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 2 said it need not address a conditional cross-appeal by prevailing patent infringement defendant Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (SIE) in which the video console maker sought a determination of patent ineligibility in view of the panel’s holding in the same ruling that a patent owner is not entitled to a new trial.

  • February 05, 2024

    Microsoft Can Amend Invalidity Contentions, Defense In OneDrive Infringement Row

    SEATTLE — In a Feb. 2 order addressing three motions he deemed “separate but ultimately related,” a federal judge in Washington granted Microsoft Corp. leave to amend its claim that three patents are invalid along with its counterclaims and affirmative defenses to allegations of infringement based upon a recent appellate ruling.

  • February 05, 2024

    Delaware Federal Judge Denies Bid For New Trial In Decade-Old Patent Case

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A federal judge in Delaware on Feb. 2 closed a case initiated in 2013 against Google LLC, in which the tech giant was cleared at a May 2023 trial of allegations that it infringed a patent the jury also said is invalid.

  • February 02, 2024

    Panel: ‘Distributed Hypermedia’ System And Method Properly Declared Patent-Ineligible

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A patent owner failed to persuade the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to undo a determination of ineligibility by a federal judge in California, with the appellate panel declaring in a Feb. 1 decision that “interacting with data objects on the World Wide Web is an abstraction.”

  • February 01, 2024

    Hearst, Photographer Argue In High Court Briefs Over Copyright Discovery Rule

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a reply brief supporting its petition for certiorari, Hearst Newspapers LLC asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court “has never applied a discovery rule to the Copyright Act” and has twice left the question open, representing that the present copyright dispute over the online use of photographs, presents “a simple and clean record” for the court to resolve the “flawed” reasons that circuits have applied the atextual rule.

  • February 01, 2024

    Scope Of Blue Cross Common-Law Trademark Rights Not Ripe For Adjudication

    BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal judge in Alabama on Jan. 31 denied a bid for summary judgment that the first two plans to use the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) trademarks acquiesced to later use by other plans or engaged in naked licensing of the marks.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Intellectual Property archive.