Mealey's Insurance Pleadings

  • January 02, 2024

    Insurer Says Silica Exclusion Bars Coverage For Underlying Bodily Injury Suits

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — No coverage is owed for underlying silica exposure bodily injury suits filed against an insured countertop manufacturer, supplier and distributor because the insured’s policies contain a silica exclusion that bars coverage for the underlying suit, an insurer says in a complaint filed in California federal court.

  • January 02, 2024

    Exclusion, Partial Summary Judgment Bids Disputed In Microcaptive Insurance Suit

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A tax attorney and the federal government have signaled agreement to resolve the attorney’s claim for disclosure of tax information even as they pursue summary judgment and expert exclusion motions in the case involving a penalty related to microcaptive insurance companies in a Florida federal court.

  • January 02, 2024

    Alleging Unpaid Claims, Iowa-Based Insurers Sue Foreign Reinsurer

    DES MOINES, Iowa — Asserting a breach of contract claim and a bad faith claim, two members of the GuideOne family of insurance companies sued a China-based reinsurer for what they allege are its refusals to pay some valid claims for reinsurance reimbursement.

  • December 18, 2023

    Pollution Liability Insurer Says Environmental Damage Claim Is Barred From Coverage

    TRENTON, N.J. — A premises pollution liability insurer says in a motion to dismiss filed in New Jersey federal court that its insured’s breach its contract and bad faith suit must be dismissed because the policy at issue clearly excludes coverage for the environmental contamination remediation costs incurred by the insured municipality.

  • December 06, 2023

    N.J. Panel Affirms Dismissal Of Tory Burch LLC’s Coronavirus Coverage Dispute

    TRENTON, N.J. — A New Jersey appeals panel on Dec. 6 affirmed a lower court’s grant of an insurer’s motion to dismiss Tory Burch LLC’s breach of contract and declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking coverage for its losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy’s executive orders issued in response to the virus did not physically deprive the insured from possessing its property.

  • December 15, 2023

    Court ‘Wrongly Expanded’ Electronic Data Exclusion, Home Depot Tells 6th Circuit

    CINCINNATI — Home Depot Inc. filed an appellant brief in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals challenging an Ohio federal court’s finding that a commercial general liability insurance policy’s electronic data exclusion bars coverage for the retailer’s losses stemming from a 2014 data breach, arguing that the lower court “wrongly expanded the narrow electronic-data exclusion beyond its natural meaning, based on assumed facts outside the record.”

  • December 13, 2023

    Duke Sues Insurers In N.C. Court, Seeks D&O Coverage For Antitrust Settlement

    RALEIGH, N.C. — Duke University filed suit in a North Carolina court seeking directors and officers liability coverage for its settlement of an underlying antitrust lawsuit, arguing that the primary insurer’s no-coverage position cannot be squared with its insurance “policy’s express antitrust coverage grant” and the absence of any exclusions for restitution or disgorgement.

  • December 12, 2023

    Insurer Seeks Reconsideration Of Denial Of Dismissal In AFFF Coverage Action

    CHARLESTON, S.C. — An insurance company has filed a reply brief in South Carolina federal court seeking reconsideration of an opinion and order denying its motion to dismiss a coverage dispute related to injuries from the firefighting substance aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) in the multidistrict litigation for AFFF, arguing that the court does not have jurisdiction over it because the insurer has no duty to defend under the policy at issue.

  • December 12, 2023

    Dental Practice Incurred No Direct Physical Loss, Insurers Argue To Pa. High Court

    PITTSBURGH — Insurers filed a reply brief in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court defending their appeal of a Pennsylvania Superior Court majority’s ruling that at the very least, it is reasonable to interpret the phrase “direct physical loss of . . . property” to encompass the loss of use of a dental practice’s property due to the spread of the coronavirus “absent any actual damage to property.”

  • December 12, 2023

    Insurer Says It Owes No Duty To Defunct Company For Underlying Asbestos Suits

    HOUSTON — An insurer claims in a complaint filed in Texas federal court that it has no duty to provide coverage for a now-defunct company named in underlying asbestos personal injury suits because the company was never insured under any policies issued by the insurer.

  • December 12, 2023

    Insurer Was Not Prejudiced By Insured’s Notice In Pollution Suit, Insured Says

    ATLANTA — A district court’s ruling that no coverage is owed to an insured for contamination cleanup costs caused by the release of petroleum and other contaminants from an underground storage tank at a gas station should be reversed because the insurer failed to show that the insured’s untimely notice was prejudicial to the insurer, the insured says in its appellant brief filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal.

  • December 08, 2023

    Faulty Work Isn’t An Accident, Doesn’t Trigger Policy, Insurer Says

    LAS VEGAS — An insurer told the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that neither a contractor found by an arbitrator to have breached a contract nor the homeowner association to which it assigned its rights was entitled to coverage for faulty work and that contrary to their arguments, there was nothing ambiguous about the term “accident.”

  • December 08, 2023

    Limitation In Disability Income Policy Is Ambiguous, Claimant Tells 9th Circuit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A district court erred in finding that a disability income insurer correctly reduced the claimant’s disability income benefits according to the terms of the disability income policy because the policy’s monthly benefit limitation is ambiguous and, therefore, must be construed in favor of the claimant, a disability claimant says in an appellant brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal.

  • December 07, 2023

    Insurer To 11th Circuit: Coverage For Project Manager Barred By Exclusion

    ATLANTA — An insurance policy’s professional services exclusion eliminates the insurer’s duty to defend where the insured, a construction management company, is being sued for construction defects on an apartment project where it operated as a “construction manager” pursuant to a “Professional Services Agreement,” the insurer argues in an appellee brief filed in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • December 06, 2023

    Contractor To 7th Circuit: Coverage Owed Under Subcontractor’s Policies

    CHICAGO — The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal should reverse a district court’s ruling that insurers do not owe a general contractor a defense or indemnification as an additional insured in a coverage dispute stemming from a subcontractor’s defective welding work at O’Hare International Airport because the underlying claims are potentially within the coverage of the insurance policies at issue, the general contractor maintains in an appellant reply brief.

  • December 06, 2023

    GEICO Seeks Default In $1.8M PIP Fraud Suit Against Doctors, Pain Clinic

    NEWARK, N.J. — GEICO on Dec. 5 moved for a clerk’s entry of default in a New Jersey federal court after a doctor and his medical practice failed to respond to GEICO’s complaint alleging that they participated in a “complex fraudulent scheme” with other medical practitioners and a pain management practice to submit fraudulent personal injury protection (PIP) billing to GEICO for services that were not performed or not medically necessary, resulting in damages to GEICO of more than $1.8 million.

  • December 05, 2023

    Insurer Seeks Reimbursement From Government For Losses Caused By Contaminated Water

    HONOLULU — In a complaint filed in Hawaii federal court, an insurer claims that the U.S. government must reimburse it for more than $500,000 paid to its insured for business losses after a fuel spill at a jet fuel storage facility operated by the U.S, Navy contaminated local drinking water and forced the insured to close its fast food restaurants for approximately four months.

  • December 01, 2023

    Contractor To 11th Circuit: Insurer’s Exclusions Don’t Bar Defense In Defect Case

    ATLANTA — A contractor’s commercial general liability insurer has failed to show that construction defects a Florida couple accused the contractor of causing fall within the exclusions of the policy and thus eliminate the insurer’s duty to defend, the contractor argues in its appellee brief filed in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in what is the third appeal in the case.

  • November 29, 2023

    On Remand, Parties Dispute Expert Exclusion Bids In RESPA Class Lawsuit

    FRESNO, Calif. — Parties in a long-running Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) class action involving captive reinsurance agreements are sparring in California federal court over expert testimony regarding whether the plaintiffs have standing under an economic harm theory.

  • November 28, 2023

    Dismissal Bid Disputed In Reimbursement Row Over Reinsurance Contract

    OMAHA, Neb. — Sparring with one defendant over claims pertaining to a reinsurance contract purportedly issued decades ago, an insurer on Nov. 27 urged a Nebraska federal court to deny a dismissal motion in its suit over reimbursement for a settlement with Montana regarding alleged asbestos exposures.

  • November 28, 2023

    CGL Insurer, Insured Agree To Dismiss Coverage Suit Over Defective Flame Arresters

    SEATTLE — A commercial general liability insurer and a manufacturer of fire and explosion mitigation systems on Nov. 27 submitted a stipulated notice of dismissal in the insurer’s declaratory action over its obligation to defend and indemnify its insured for an underlying action alleging that flame arresters the company installed in five paper mills were defective.

  • November 28, 2023

    Insurer Argues That It Owes No Coverage For Judgment Against Contractor

    WILMINGTON, Del. — An insurer that filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in a federal court in Delaware against a contractor and homeowners association filed an answer to counterclaims by the association on Nov. 27, arguing that it owes no coverage for more than $8 million in damages awarded to the association in its underlying case against the contractor for excessive water infiltration and other issues.

  • November 21, 2023

    Insurers Say Contribution To Lead Abatement Fund Is Not Damages Under Policies

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — An Ohio appellate court erred in determining that an insured’s obligation to contribute to a lead paint abatement fund constitutes damages under insurance policies because the language of the policies establishes that there were no damages for which coverage is afforded, the insurers reiterate in an appellant reply brief filed in the Ohio Supreme Court.

  • November 20, 2023

    Electrical Contractor’s CGL Insurers Settle Dispute Over Coverage For Defects Suit

    EL PASO, Texas — An electrical contractor’s commercial general liability insurers on Nov. 17 notified a federal court in Texas that they had reached a settlement in their dispute over their responsibility to cover their mutual insured in an underlying construction defects action and requested that the case, which was set for a bench trial on Dec. 4, be removed from the court’s docket while they finalize dismissal documents.

  • November 20, 2023

    Judge Issues Remand, Says Guaranty Association Is Insolvent Insurer’s Obligor

    NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge granted homeowners’ motion to file an amended complaint and name the Louisiana Guaranty Association (LIGA) as a defendant in their breach of contract suit against their now-insolvent homeowners insurer for its purported failure to adequately cover their losses from Hurricane Ida, finding that LIGA is the statutory obligor for the insolvent insurer and that the case must be remanded to state court due to the absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Insurance Pleadings archive.