Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

  • April 04, 2024

    Appeals Court Weighs In On Software Copyright Case For 3rd Time

    CINCINNATI — A summary judgment in favor of infringement defendants by a federal judge in Michigan was upheld April 3 by the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, in its third ruling in a longstanding dispute over copyright protection for computer code.

  • April 04, 2024

    California Federal Judge Offers Glimpse At Hurdles In TikTok IP Row

    SAN FRANCISCO — In advance of a planned April 5 hearing on a motion to dismiss copyright infringement and false advertising claims leveled against TikTok Inc. and others, a federal judge in California has directed the video sharing app to be prepared to defend its position that the registration requirement in federal copyright law extends to copyrights registered abroad.

  • April 03, 2024

    9th Circuit Denies Remand Of Terror-Aiding Suits Against Social Media Firms

    SAN FRANCISCO — Citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Twitter Inc. v. Taamneh, 143 S. Ct. 1206 (2023), a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on April 2 denied motions by the family members of terror victims in three suits to remand their cases for the purpose of filing amended complaints, concluding that amendment would be futile because the appellants failed to allege a necessary component in their claims that Twitter Inc., Facebook Inc. and Google LLC violated the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) by permitting terrorists to use their social networks for nefarious reasons.

  • April 02, 2024

    Pandora Prevails, Panel Agrees: Asserted Patents Ineligible For Protection

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld a judgment of patent ineligibility entered by a California federal judge, agreeing that all claims of three patents asserted against the music streaming service Pandora Media LLC are directed to “nonpatentable subject matter.”

  • April 01, 2024

    Delaware Judge Tosses Insurers’ Subrogation Suits Arising From Ransomware Attack

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware judge dismissed insurers’ subrogation lawsuits seeking recovery from an application service provider for the amount they paid to their nonprofit insureds for investigative and remediation steps arising from a ransomware attack, finding that the fact that the data breach occurred and the nonprofits incurred expenses alone is not sufficient to state a claim under the policies.

  • April 01, 2024

    9th Circuit Panel Refuses To Rehear Ruling In $40M Commercial Crime Coverage Suit

    PASADENA, Calif. — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 29 voted unanimously to deny insurers’ petition for panel rehearing challenging its reversal of a lower federal court’s dismissal of a financial services company insured’s claim for loss under its commercial crime insurance policy’s “Computer And Funds Transfer Fraud Insuring Agreement” and its claim for tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, standing by its finding that the authorized submission of fraudulent electronic data into the insured’s computer system can arguably be described as “fraudulent entry” to trigger coverage.

  • March 29, 2024

    Blockchain Technology Correctly Declared Patent-Ineligible, Panel Says

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld a New York federal judge’s determination that a patented “framework” for determining and recording the unique pattern of imperfections on a gemstone to a blockchain recites the abstract idea of gathering and storing data.

  • March 28, 2024

    Judge Largely Denies Coinbase’s Bid For Judgment On Pleadings In SEC Enforcement

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York on March 27 issued a split ruling mostly denying Coinbase Inc.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings because the Securities and Exchange Commission adequately alleged that the company engaged in the unregistered sale of securities but also finding that the commission had not substantiated its claim that Coinbase acts as an unregistered broker.

  • March 28, 2024

    Ankle Monitor Is Potentially A Computer Triggering Professional Liability Coverage

    CHICAGO — An Illinois appeals panel held March 27 that an ankle monitor, at the very least, is potentially computer hardware triggering professional services liability coverage, reversing a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying personal injury lawsuit.

  • March 21, 2024

    COMMENTARY: AI Raises Stakes Across Cybersecurity And Disputes Landscape

    By Lorenzo Grillo

  • March 27, 2024

    Judge Allows UCL, Negligence Claims Against Roblox In Mothers’ ‘Gambling’ Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on March 26 granted in part and denied in part a motion by Roblox Corp. to dismiss a putative class action brought against it by two mothers who accuse it of being liable for their minor children’s engagement in illegal gambling games on the Roblox platform.

  • March 27, 2024

    Spyware Suit Judge Partly Denies Issuing Letter Rogatory On Canadian Lab

    OAKLAND, Calif. — An Israeli spyware firm that is fending off computer fraud and trespass allegations by WhatsApp Inc. saw its motion to issue a letter rogatory on a third-party Canadian watchdog lab partly denied March 26 by a California federal judge who deemed some of the information sought to be duplicative of discovery already received from the plaintiff.

  • March 26, 2024

    Panel Says Sex Toy Maker’s ‘Inconspicuous’ Arbitration Agreement Not Binding

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on March 25 affirmed a trial court’s denial of a sex toy maker’s motion to compel arbitration of a putative class action filed against it by a consumer who claimed that the company deceptively marketed one of its products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding that the company’s “browsewrap” arbitration agreement could be viewed only by clicking a “tiny, inconspicuous link.”

  • March 25, 2024

    FDA And Doctors Complaining That FDA’s Ivermectin Tweets Were Ultra Vires Settle

    GALVESTON, Texas — In a lawsuit by a group of doctors claiming that the Food and Drug Administration exceeded its statutory authority when it created social media and government website posts recommending that people not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19, a Texas federal judge on March 22 dismissed the case with prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal filed by the parties.

  • March 25, 2024

    Publishers Ask 2nd Circuit To Find Internet Archive’s EBook Lending Infringing

    NEW YORK — The “wholly manufactured” practice of “controlled digital lending” in which Internet Archive (IA) digitizes books and lends them online “is radical and unlawful,” book publishers tell the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in their appellee brief, seeking affirmance of a trial court’s finding that the practice infringed their copyrights.

  • March 22, 2024

    Meta, Spotify Back Epic’s Motion To Enforce Injunction In App Store Antitrust Row

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Agreeing with plaintiff Epic Games Inc. that Apple Inc. has not complied with an injunction requiring it to permit app developers to inform users of methods of making in-app purchases (IAPs) outside of the App Store, Meta Platforms Inc., Spotify USA Inc. and others moved to file amicus curiae briefs in California federal court supporting Epic’s motion to enforce the injunction.

  • March 21, 2024

    DOJ, States Sue Apple For Anticompetitive, Exclusionary Conduct, In Apps, Phones

    NEWARK, N.J. — Apple Inc. was hit with allegations of monopolization under the Sherman Act on March 21, as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the attorneys general for 16 states, on behalf of the United States and the corresponding states, filed a complaint in New Jersey federal court accusing the tech giant of years of “respond[ing] to competitive threats . . . by making it harder or more expensive for its users and developers to leave than by making it more attractive for them to stay” while “wrap[ping] itself in a cloak of privacy, security, and consumer preferences to justify its anticompetitive conduct.”

  • March 20, 2024

    4th Circuit Stands By Contributory Copyright Liability Findings For ISP

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 19 denied dual petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc, leaving in place a panel decision one month earlier that vacated a $1 billion award for vicarious copyright infringement by an internet service provider (ISP) while also upholding findings that the ISP is liable for contributory infringement.

  • March 19, 2024

    Coronavirus Tracing App Creator Again Denied Writ Of Injunction By High Court

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A month and a half after U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan denied its application for a writ of injunction, a software company on March 18 saw its application to enjoin Apple Inc.’s purported “censorship of software” rejected a second time, this time by the entire court.

  • March 18, 2024

    High Court Hears Arguments On State Action, Government Coercion Of Social Media

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In oral arguments on March 18 over claims that the federal government violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by purportedly coercing social media platforms into removing disfavored speech, the U.S. Supreme Court justices sought clarification on such issues as state action, traceability and redressability as they grapple with the respondents’ standing and the scope of an injunction against the government.

  • March 15, 2024

    Judge OKs Arbitral Review Of Esports Players’ $120M Monopoly Claims

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge dismissed a putative class action brought by two professional players of the video game “Call of Duty” (CoD) and one affiliated business entity against developer Activision Blizzard Inc. after the parties filed a stipulation agreeing that an international arbitral tribunal will decide the arbitrability of claims that Activision monopolized CoD-related esports.

  • March 15, 2024

    High Court: State Action On Social Media Requires Exercise Of Actual Authority

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Vacating and remanding two lawsuits in which public officials were accused of violating the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by blocking naysayers on social media, the U.S. Supreme Court on March 15 established a two-step test for determining whether such activity by an official constitutes state action, making it susceptible to legal action under U.S. Code Title 42 Section 1983, or is merely their own private, protected speech.

  • March 15, 2024

    Snap Waives Response To Assault Victim’s Certiorari Petition Over CDA Immunity

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Snap Inc., owner of the popular Snapchat social media app, declined to file a response to a petition for certiorari in which a minor sexual assault victim asks the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the scope of immunity from liability to which service providers are entitled under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), related to the minor having been groomed by an adult through Snapchat.

  • March 14, 2024

    Epic Says New Apple App Store Policies Flout UCL Injunction In Antitrust Suit

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Epic Games Inc. filed a motion on March 13 asking a California federal court to enforce an injunction requiring Apple Inc. to permit app developers to inform users of methods of making in-app purchases (IAPs) outside of the App Store, stating that Apple’s newly instituted policies “introduce new restrictions and burdens that . . . effectively nullify” the injunction’s relief for anti-steering provisions that were deemed in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • March 14, 2024

    Bitcoin Firm Maintains Its Pursuit Of Discovery Sanctions Against Miner

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Responding to a Florida federal judge’s order to show cause, a cryptocurrency company filed notice that its disputes over post-trial discovery with a former business associate had not been resolved and that it will continue pursuing civil contempt sanctions against the defendant.