Mealey's Class Actions

  • May 09, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Consumer’s ‘Slack-Fill’ UCL Suit Against Supplement Maker

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit against a nutritional supplement maker for allegedly selling its products with a deceptively large container containing a relatively small amount of product after finding that the court lacked equitable jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ putative class claims.

  • May 09, 2024

    Ad Customers Accuse Reddit Of ‘Click-Through Fraud’ In Class Complaint

    SAN FRANCISCO — A tech company on May 8 filed a putative class action in California federal court against Reddit Inc., operator of a popular social media platform, accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and breach of contract by allegedly charging fraudulent fees per click on digital advertisements to it and other companies while allowing fraudulent clicks on its platform.

  • May 09, 2024

    Kimberly-Clark Seeks Dismissal Of ‘Illogical’ Claims It Caused PFAS Contamination

    NEW HAVEN, Conn. — Kimberly-Clark Corp. has moved in Connecticut federal court to dismiss a putative class action on grounds that the plaintiffs’ allegations that the company is the source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in the local groundwater supply are “illogical and contradictory on their face.”

  • May 09, 2024

    Judge Tosses Class Action Alleging Ovulation Kits Are Deceptively Labeled

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge dismissed without leave to amend a putative class action alleging that at-home ovulation test kits were deceptively labeled in violation of New York and California false advertising laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) after finding that the women who purchased the tests failed to show that a reasonable consumer of the products would be deceived.

  • May 09, 2024

    Objector Appeals $125M PACER Class Settlement Approval To Federal Circuit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — An attorney who is a member of a class whose claims that excessive fees were paid to obtain court records via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system (PACER) were settled has appealed the final approval of the $125 million settlement to the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • May 08, 2024

    Judge Mostly Denies Summary Judgment In ERISA Case Over Annuity Calculations

    CHICAGO — Denying the bulk of a summary judgment motion in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act dispute over allegedly outdated mortality tables used to calculate joint and survivor annuity (JSA) benefits in two Citgo Petroleum Corp. pension plans, an Illinois federal judge said in part that he “cannot credit one expert's opinion over another” at this stage.

  • May 08, 2024

    Judgment Entered Dismissing UCL Suit Against OnlyFans For Automatic Renewals

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on May 7 entered judgment dismissing a putative class action against two entities that own and operate the adult entertainment website OnlyFans after granting a motion to dismiss claims that the company violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by failing to notify subscribers that they would be automatically charged monthly for subscriptions to various OnlyFans models.

  • May 08, 2024

    Lockheed Martin Moves To Dismiss ERISA Suit Over Pension Risk Transfers

    GREENBELT, Md. — Moving to dismiss one of a quartet of similar recent putative class actions challenging pension risk transfers (PRTs) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Lockheed Martin Corp. told a Maryland federal court that the retirees are receiving all the benefits they are due and fail to state their claims.

  • May 07, 2024

    Parties Reach Agreement In Principle To Settle Fracking Securities Litigation

    HOUSTON — A federal judge in Texas has issued an order directing the parties in a shareholder lawsuit against a hydraulic fracturing operator and three of its senior executives to file a settlement agreement and a motion for preliminary approval in light of the parties’ joint motion notifying the district court that they have reached an agreement in principle to settle the case.  The parties did not provide details related to the agreement.

  • May 07, 2024

    Redfin Seeks To Settle Commissions Conspiracy Claims For $9.25 Million

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Redfin Corp. and home sellers who have accused the broker and others of violating the Sherman Act by entering into an agreement to artificially inflate the cost of commissions in residential real estate transactions filed in a federal court in Missouri on May 6 a notice of pending settlement and joint motion to stay as to Redfin; on the same day, Redfin filed a Form 8-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stating that the settlement was for $9.25 million.

  • May 07, 2024

    Parties In ERISA Imprudence Case Over Funds Report Unspecified Global Deal

    SAN FRANCISCO — With a bench trial imminent, parties in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action over the allegedly imprudent retention of certain funds told a California federal court on May 6 that they reached an unspecified agreement “in principle to a global resolution” of the class action and a recently filed related case.

  • May 07, 2024

    Federal Judge Rules For Class On 2 Issues In ERISA Residual Annuities Case

    NEW YORK — After “resolving the two disputed issues” in favor of the class after a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that drew an unsuccessful certiorari petition, a New York federal judge has entered a revised final judgment in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action over residual annuities.

  • May 06, 2024

    ‘Waste Of Time’ Summary Judgment Ruling Trims ERISA Class Case Over Fees, Funds

    BOSTON — Saying “this entire summary judgment exercise has been a monumental waste of time,” a Massachusetts federal judge partly granted the defendants’ motion in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action challenging management of retirement plans but denied summary judgment as to imprudence allegations regarding record-keeping fees and retention of challenged funds.

  • May 06, 2024

    Mortgagors Appeal Finding That Broker Price Opinion Was Not An Inspection Fee

    GREENBELT, Md. — A couple who filed a putative class complaint against their lenders over a broker price opinion (BPO) fee that appeared on their account after their mortgage was identified as being in active loss mitigation and a putative class member who attempted to intervene filed a notice of appeal on May 4 after a federal magistrate judge in Maryland granted the lenders summary judgment and ruled that the BPO fee at issue was not an inspection fee prohibited by Maryland’s usury statute.

  • May 03, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Google For Banner Ads

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — On remand from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a federal judge in California dismissed with prejudice putative class claims brought against Google LLC by two website owners for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws in relation to Google’s former practice on its Android search app of superimposing its logo and a “Related Pages” banner on the plaintiffs’ websites, which featured links to competitors’ websites.

  • May 03, 2024

    2nd Circuit Affirms Expert Exclusion, Summary Judgment In Food Labeling Case

    NEW YORK — A district court properly excluded testimony from experts retained by a class of consumers who alleged that an “All Natural” claim on snack foods and granola bars is deceptive or misleading, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said May 2, and because they failed to show that the company’s label would deceive a reasonable consumer, the court affirmed summary judgment and found that arguments that the court erred in decertifying the class are moot.

  • May 03, 2024

    Amended Complaint Planned In Fiduciary Breach Case Against Health Plans’ Sponsor

    CAMDEN, N.J. — In a granted joint stipulation, parties in a high-profile putative class Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary duty case over alleged “mismanagement of prescription-drug benefits” told a New Jersey federal court they agree that a pending dismissal motion will be mooted by a forthcoming amended complaint.

  • May 03, 2024

    Production, Brief Ordered In Nonparty Discovery Disputes In Apple Antitrust Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — In response to recently filed briefs concerning discovery plaintiffs seek from two nonparties in their iPhone app monopolization class action against Apple Inc., a California federal magistrate judge issued an order partly granting their motion to compel certain records from app developer Rocket Money, while addressing the company’s concerns about discovery burdens and protecting the confidentiality of its records.

  • May 03, 2024

    Faulty Shingles Dispute Terminated Following Parties’ Notice Of Settlement

    KANSAS CITY, Kan. — After receiving notice of settlement from a group of property owners and roofing manufacturer, a Kansas federal judge ordered a dispute over the company’s allegedly faulty shingles to be administratively terminated.

  • May 02, 2024

    Split 2nd Circuit Affirms Effective Vindication Ruling In ERISA Arbitration Row

    NEW YORK — In a 2-1 ruling on a high-profile Employee Retirement Income Security Act issue, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on May 1 upheld denial of a motion for individual arbitration over an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) deal, with the majority applying the effective vindication exception as three other circuits did “in closely analogous cases” and asserting that “this is not actually a class action.”

  • May 02, 2024

    Borrowers’ Class Suit Alleging Lender Wrongfully Denied COVID Relief Dismissed

    PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on May 1 dismissed without prejudice borrowers’ putative class action alleging that their lender violated state and federal statutes when it denied some borrowers COVID-19 aid and approved only a portion of the aid for others, finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) or the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

  • May 02, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Consumer’s UCL Suit Against Herbal Cough Drop Maker

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge granted a cough drop maker’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed without prejudice a putative class action filed against it by a consumer who claimed that it deceptively advertises its cough drops as offering herbal and medicinal benefits in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • May 02, 2024

    7th Circuit Vacates Class Certification Denial In Prisoner Dental Care Case

    CHICAGO — A Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a trial court’s denial of class certification in a case against an Illinois county and sheriff by a former detainee who alleges that he and others were denied sufficient dental care, finding that the lower court erred in concluding that commonality, typicality and superiority were not met; the appellate panel also declined the county’s argument that class representatives cannot receive incentive awards and instead ruled that they are appropriate for named plaintiffs “so long as they comply with the requirements of” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

  • May 02, 2024

    Washington Jury Awards Hospital Workers More Than $98M In Wage, Hour Damages

    SEATTLE — A Washington jury returned a more than $98 million damages verdict for health care workers in a wage and hour class suit in which they alleged unlawful rounding practices and meal break denials.

  • May 02, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Class Certification In Marketing Of Pet Health Product Suit

    PASADENA, Calif. — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel upheld certification of a class of dog supplement purchasers who allege the products they bought were falsely marketed as improving joint health, finding that reliance on an unexecuted damages model to certify a class is permissible and that sufficient data was provided to support the certification ruling.