No Ambiguity In Policy, Panel Says In Affirming Termination Of Benefits

Mealey's (July 11, 2016, 2:06 PM EDT) -- PHILADELPHIA — The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 7 affirmed a district court’s finding that there is no ambiguity in a residual disability policy regarding the policy’s use of the term “occupation” and the policy rider’s use of the term “insured’s occupation” (Daniel S. Bowerman, D.C. v. National Life Insurance Co., No. 15-1129, 3rd Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12503).

(Unpublished opinion available. Document #17-160808-002Z.)

Daniel Bowerman, a chiropractor, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against...
To view the full article, register now.