3rd Circuit Vacates, Remands Disability Suit, Says Issues Of Fact Exist On Termination
Mealey's (July 11, 2016, 1:47 PM EDT) -- PHILADELPHIA — The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 7 determined that summary judgment in favor of a disability insurer was not appropriate because issues of material fact exist regarding whether the medical evidence supports the insurer’s termination of benefits and whether the termination was arbitrary and capricious (Frank Reed v. Citigroup Inc., et al., No. 15-2094, 3rd Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12523).