(June 23, 2016, 9:00 AM EDT) -- SYRACUSE, N.Y. — An insurer told a federal court in New York on June 14 that its reinsurer’s motion for leave to reply regarding an objection to a magistrate judge’s earlier discovery order should be denied because, among other reasons, the proposed reply allegedly contains new arguments (Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Century Indemnity Company, No. 13-cv-00995, N.D. N.Y.)....