Some Claims Tossed, Some Survive Dismissal In Starbucks Underfill Suit
(June 21, 2016, 2:29 PM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on June 17 partially dismissed claims in a class action suit accusing Starbucks Corp. of underfilling its coffee beverages but leaving intact claims for breach of express warranty, violation California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), violation of California’s false advertising law (FAL) and fraud (Siera Strumlauf, et al. v. Starbucks Corporation, No. 16-1306, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79456).
(Order available. Document #43-160701-001R.)
Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles filed a class...