Mealey's (March 15, 2016, 10:33 AM EDT) -- GREENBELT, Md. — A Maryland federal judge found March 3 that summary judgment is not appropriate regarding whether the alleged subsidiary of an insured is covered under 2007-08 and 2008-09 primary and excess insurance policies, denying in part summary judgment cross-motions in a dispute over coverage for underlying product liability lawsuits involving heparin (The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., et al. v. American Capital Ltd., et al., No. 09-0100, D. Md.; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23627; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26822)....