New Jersey Federal Judge Sides Partly With Aetna; Subrogation Claims Preempted

Mealey's (March 3, 2016, 1:34 PM EST) -- CAMDEN, N.J. — Allegations that Aetna Inc. violated New Jersey’s anti-subrogation laws were rejected, in part, on March 1 by a New Jersey federal judge on grounds of preemption by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (Michelle Roche, et al. v. Aetna Inc., et al., No. 13-1377, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25208).

(Decision available. Document #54-160309-055Z.)

Leave to amend would be futile for plaintiff Tim Singleton due to his failure to exhaust all administrative remedies as proscribed by his Aetna plan, according to U.S....
To view the full article, register now.