(March 1, 2016, 10:09 AM EST) -- ATLANTA — A jury’s initial inconsistent verdict and the dismissal of a recalcitrant juror during deliberations are not reasons to overturn an $11 million metal-on-metal hip implant verdict, the plaintiff told a federal court in Georgia on Feb. 26 in opposing defendant Wright Medical Technology Inc.’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), a new trial or an amended judgment (In Re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2329, No. 12-md-2329, Robyn Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., No. 13-297, N.D. Ga., Atlanta Div.)....