Mealey's (February 23, 2016, 3:31 PM EST) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — The “objective/subjective” test for enhanced patent damages — already rejected in the attorney fee context — came under fire Feb. 23 at the U.S. Supreme Court in one hour of consolidated argument covering two cases (Stryker Corp., et al. v. Zimmer Inc. and Zimmer Surgical, No. 14-1520; Halo Electronics Inc. v. Pulse Electronics Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp., No. 14-1513, U.S. Sup.)....